Patterned MR device with controlled shape anisotropy

ABSTRACT

A magnetic sensor with increased sensitivity, lower noise, and improved frequency response is described. The sensor&#39;s free layer is ribbon shaped and is closely flanked at each long edge by a ribbon of magnetically soft, high permeability material. The side stripes of soft magnetic material absorb external field flux and concentrate the flux to flow into the sensor&#39;s edges to promote larger MR sensor magnetization rotation. Side stripes may be located in the plane of the free layer a maximum distance of 0.1 microns, above a plane that includes a top surface of the free layer, or below a plane that includes the bottom surface of the magnetic sensor. Edges of each side stripe may be aligned above or below a portion of the magnetic sensor.

This is a Divisional application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/012,667, filed on Feb. 5, 2008, which is herein incorporated by reference in its entirety, and assigned to a common assignee.

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The invention relates to the general field of magnetic sensors with particular reference to improving their sensitivity, frequency response, and noise level.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Magneto-resistive (MR) thin film sensors used for low field sensing applications usually take the form of long stripes with a width of several microns and a length of tens of microns, up to about 100 microns as disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 4,847,584 and U.S. Pat. No. 5,247,278, and described by G. Hoffman and J. Birtwistle in “Factors affecting the performance of a thin film magnetoresistive vector magnetometer,” J. Appl. Phys., vol. 53, pp. 8266-8268, November 1982.

With such a large aspect ratio, the shape anisotropy of the long stripe helps to maintain the magnetic domain structure within the sensing layer of the device (which has a thickness of <10 nm in most cases). Prior work by B. Pant described in “Effect of interstrip gap on the sensitivity of high sensitivity magnetoresistive transducers,” J. Appl. Phys., vol. 79, pp. 6123-6125, April 2006, also shows that reducing the gap between adjacent stripe patterns can help alleviate the “stiffness” of the sensor caused by the shape anisotropy of the long stripe. Thus, the sensitivity of the multi-stripe sensor array can be improved, as we will discuss below.

A routine search of the prior art was performed with the following additional references of interest being found. U.S. Pat. No. 7,283,336 shows a single-domain free layer having a bias field at side edges of the read sensor. U.S. Pat. No. 7,203,039 discloses an additional layer of soft magnetic material abutting hard biasing layers to prevent flux leakage. U.S. Pat. No. 7,016,166 shows biasing structures abutting each side of the single domain MR structure. U.S. Pat. No. 6,873,499 shows flux guides abutting the read sensor.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

One objective of the present invention is to provide a MR sensor having a linear response due to uniform rotation of its free layer magnetization.

Another objective of at least one embodiment of the present invention is to provide a MR sensor exhibiting minimal low frequency noise due to a single domain free layer.

Still another objective of at least one embodiment of the present invention is to provide a MR sensor wherein field concentration and demagnetization cancellation by neighboring soft magnetic patterns are not limited by the MR sensor's free layer's properties so that the free layer can be independently optimized to increase the sensitivity of the MR sensor.

A further object of at least one embodiment of the present invention is to improve the sensitivity to magnetic fields of a MR sensor.

These objectives have been achieved with a sensor that has a free layer in the shape of a long ribbon having an aspect ratio greater than about 3, and preferably greater than 5, and a width (which coincides with the direction of the field to be sensed) that is less than the exchange length of the free layer material. The free layer may be part of an AMR, GMR, or TMR device.

Concentration of flux from sources external to the free layer is enhanced by a pair of soft magnetic ribbons located at the sides of the MR sensor in close proximity to the sensor's long edges.

This side pattern acts as a magnetic flux bridge that absorbs field flux, concentrating it to flow into the MR sensor edges to promote larger MR sensor magnetization rotation. For such an effect to work efficiently, high permeability material is preferred. Also, close proximity of the structure to the MR sensor edge, higher moment of the structure material relative to the MR sensor free layer as well as the physical shape of the structure are all factors that help to concentrate the flux.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIGS. 1A and 1B illustrate the basic principle of the invention and compare the degree of magnetization rotation with and without the presence of patterned soft magnetic material located at the sides of a MR sensor.

FIGS. 2A and 2B show cross-sectional and plan views, respectively, of an embodiment that represents the simplest form of the invention to implement wherein the side stripes and the free layer are formed in a single deposition.

FIGS. 3A, 3B, and 3C show embodiments wherein the free layer is located below the side stripes, allowing for the possibility of the latter overlapping the former.

FIGS. 4A, 4B, and 4C show embodiments similar to those shown in FIGS. 3A-3C but wherein the side stripes have asymmetrically tapered edges.

FIGS. 5A, 5B, and 5C show embodiments wherein the full MR device is located above the side stripes, allowing for the possibility of the former overlapping the latter.

FIGS. 6A, 6B, and 6C show embodiments similar to those shown in FIGS. 5A-5C but wherein the side stripes have asymmetrically tapered edges.

FIGS. 7A and 7B show an embodiment wherein the side stripe edges are symmetrically tapered and aligned with the free layer.

DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS

Due to the large size of prior art sensing devices, domains in a free layer have a minimum dimension of about 1 μm. This is much larger than the exchange length of typical free layer material (200 nm-300 nm). Consequently, the presence of domains can be expected in these prior art sensors. To achieve stable and linear response from a MR device, the magnetization response to an external field is preferably due to a gradual magnetization rotation of the free layer in the applied field direction as in normal MR sensors used in hard disk drive heads. Magnetization switching through domain movement in the free layer, however, is very sensitive to the external field because of the lower energy needed to move a magnetization vortex, and is also intrinsically non-linear and very noisy.

For example, Barkhausen noise resulting from domain motion in the presence of an applied field as described by K. B. Klaassen and J. C. L. van Peppen in “Barkhausen noise in thin-film recording heads,” IEEE Trans. on Magn., vol. 26, pp. 1697-1699, September 1990, may lead to significant low frequency noise and signal level uncertainty. Thus, although the sensitivity of domain movement is high, the noise that it causes offsets the gain of the high sensitivity and produces an effectively low SNR sensor. For accurate and high sensitivity field sensing, a single domain free layer should be the best situation. This requirement will need the minimal dimension of the field sensor, i.e. width of the sensor in most cases, to be shorter than the exchange length of the free layer material. Thus, a sensor width of less than 300 nm would be the most suitable.

Insufficient demagnetization field cancellation is another concern. For a high length-over-width aspect ratio sensor, as required for a single domain free layer design, the shape anisotropy along the length direction could be high enough to cause sensitivity loss, especially in the low field case. In a prior study by B. Pant described in “Effect of interstrip gap on the sensitivity of high sensitivity magnetoresistive transducers,” J. Appl. Phys., vol. 79, pp. 6123-6125, April 2006, sensor stripes were arranged closer to each other so that the edge charges from sensors helped to offset the demagnetization field in their neighboring sensors.

However, using a neighboring sensor's free layer to offset the demagnetization field is not a very efficient way to enhance the sensitivity of a stripe type field sensor. The reason is that the MR sensor free layer is usually very thin, which requires very close proximity between the sensors to actually utilize the neighboring charges. For a free layer with a 10 nm thickness, the expected proximity should be around the same scale, i.e. 10 nm, which is very hard to manufacture.

Use of adjacent soft material to enhance sensitivity by absorbing the meager flux of the magnetic field to be sensed by the soft material and then re-concentrating that flux in the sensor free layer could theoretically lead to a higher rotation of the free layer's magnetization. This flux concentration effect is preferably achieved through some individual neighboring single layer magnetic structures rather than through the MR sensor itself. In this way, the flux concentration effect will not be limited by the free layer's thickness, magnetic moment, and material properties. Such a single layer structure at the side of the MR sensor may be comprised of uniformly constituted magnetic material having higher moment than the sensor's free layer, as well as high permeability and low coercivity.

The present disclosure features a MR sensor in a single domain state without forming domain walls in the sensor's free layer, and is not limited to a specific MR sensor configuration, but rather any MR sensor with a magnetic free layer. With a single domain, free layer magnetization undergoes uniform rotation in the presence of an external field to produce a linear response. Also in the single domain state, various noises of magnetic origin can be effectively eliminated or reduced. However, due to the single domain requirement, the sensor width, which coincides with the direction of the field to be sensed, needs to be less than the exchange length of the free layer material.

An important feature of the invention is the utilization of patterned soft magnetic material located at the sides of the MR sensor (stripe) in close proximity to the sensor's long edges. This side pattern absorbs external field flux, concentrating it to flow into the MR sensor edges to promote larger MR sensor magnetization rotation. For such an effect to work efficiently, high permeability material is preferred. Also, close proximity of the structure to the MR sensor edge, higher moment of the structure material relative to the free layer as well as the physical shape of the structure are all factors that help to concentrate the flux, as will be detailed in the embodiments presented below.

FIGS. 1A-1B show a comparison of simulated effective magnetization rotation of the MR sensor free layer along the applied field direction, with and without the neighboring soft magnetic film of the invention. FIG. 1A shows the sensor structure that was simulated. For simulation purposes, free layer 11 has a width of ˜10 μm in the x-axis direction, a thickness of 15 nm in z-axis direction, and the gap between adjacent free layers in the x-axis direction is 200 nm. The neighboring soft magnetic layers 14 bridge the gap between adjacent free layers and are formed below and between them. Soft magnetic layers have a width of 700 nm, a thickness of 15 nm, and spacing of 30 nm between a top surface of layer 14 and a bottom surface of free layer 11. Layers 11 and 14 are assumed to be made of the same soft material with B_(s)=1 T.

FIG. 1B shows the free layer 11 magnetization in the x-axis direction vs. the position along a width direction under a 10 Oe x-axis field, with and without a soft magnetic layer 14. Results show that the added soft magnetic layer can enhance the magnetization rotation by more than 30%. This clearly demonstrates the advantage of providing a neighboring soft magnetic film to enhance the sensitivity of a MR sensor stripe.

In summary, we have found the major advantages of the invention when using single domain narrow width MR sensors with neighboring soft magnetic patterns include the following. First, MR sensor response is more linear due to the uniform rotation of the free layer magnetization. Secondly, sensor low frequency noise is less due to the single domain free layer. Thirdly, field concentration and demagnetization cancellation by neighboring soft magnetic patterns is not limited by the MR sensor's free layer's properties so the free layer can be independently optimized to increase the sensitivity of the MR sensor.

The embodiments described below having a soft magnetic layer pattern on the sides of a MR sensor closest to the edges of the free layer, but lying below the free layer top surface as shown in FIGS. 5A-6C may be made using procedures similar to those used for hard bias deposition in the manufacture of hard drive read heads, except that the hard magnetic material is replaced by a soft magnetic material. When the free layer and soft magnetic layer are formed in the same plane, then a single deposition step may be used to deposit both layers. In other embodiments where the MR stripe is formed entirely below or above the soft magnetic layers, then separate deposition steps are required for the free layer and soft magnetic layers.

In all embodiments, the free layer thickness may be from 10 to 300 Angstroms and the soft magnetic layers (flux absorbing stripes) may have a thickness between 10 and 1000 Angstroms. Moreover, each flux absorbing stripe may have one or more layers and may be comprised of one or more elements selected from Co, Fe, Ni, B, N, Cr, Hf, Nb, and Zr.

Embodiment 1

Referring now to FIG. 2A, seen there, in cross-sectional view, are free layer 21, reference (pinned) layer 22, and spacer layer 23 that may be Cu for GMR (Giant Magneto-Resistance) and metal oxide for TMR (Tunneling Magneto-Resistance) devices which have been patterned into long stripes. For the AMR (Anisotropic Magneto-Resistance) device case, only layer 21 exists. For GMR and TMR embodiments, reference layer magnetization is pinned in the x-axis direction by one or more underlying magnetic layers (not shown). Non-sensing soft magnetic layers 24 are patterned and positioned in close proximity to the longer edges of the MR sensor.

Referring to FIG. 2B, the width 25 of free layer 21 is less than the magnetic exchange length of typical free layer material, i.e. <300 nm in most cases. The aspect ratio for the free layer (thickness/width) is preferably at least 5. The MR sensor length along the y-axis direction is substantially longer than width 25 and is at least 1 μm. The soft magnetic layers also referred to as flux absorbing stripes 24 have a similar, or even greater length than the MR sensor in the y-axis direction. There is no specific width requirement for the soft magnetic layers but their width is preferably greater than width 25. The thickness of the soft magnetic layers is proximate to that of the free layer and the relative thickness of layers 21, 24 satisfies the inequality of M_(film)t_(film)>M_(free)t_(free), where M_(film) and M_(free) are the magnetization of the soft magnetic layers and free layer, respectively, and t_(film) and t_(free) are the thickness of the soft magnetic layers and free layer, respectively.

The spacing 26 between flux absorbing stripes 24 and free layer 21 is no greater than twice the larger of these two thicknesses (t_(film) and t_(free)), and is preferably less than 0.1 microns. The vertical distance 27 between a bottom surface of a soft magnetic layer and the MR sensor stack's bottom surface in FIG. 2A is such that the vertical distance between the center lines of layers 21 and 24 is within ±100% of the thickness of the soft magnetic layer. Although only a single instance of the side by side arrangement of MR stack and patterned flux absorbing stripes is shown in the figure, said arrangement can be repeated with a chosen periodicity along the x-axis direction to form multiple MR sensing stripes interleaved with multiple patterned flux absorbing stripes, with neighboring MR stripes sharing a common patterned flux absorbing stripe 24.

Embodiment 2

This embodiment, shown in FIGS. 3A, B, &C, is the same as Embodiment 1 except that distance 37 is equal or larger than the MR film stack and flux absorbing stripes 34 a, 34 b are formed entirely above a plane 41-41 that includes the top surface of free layer 21. The thickness of each flux absorbing stripe still satisfies M_(film)t_(film)>M_(free)t_(free). In FIG. 3A, there is a plane 40-40 that bisects the MR stripe including free layer 21 in a lengthwise direction along the y-axis. A second edge 34 e 2 of a first flux absorbing stripe 34 a is offset from a first edge 21 e 2 of the free layer along the x-axis direction that is orthogonal to plane 40-40. A second edge 34 e 1 of a second flux absorbing stripe 34 b is offset from a first opposing edge 21 e 1 along a (−)x-axis direction such that there is no overlap of free layer 21 with flux absorbing stripes 34 a, 34 b in a z-axis direction. Note that opposing first edges 21 e 1, 21 e 2 are also formed along a side of spacer layer 23 and reference layer 22. Thus, neither of the second edges is aligned above any portion of the free layer. Distance 36 along the x-axis direction in FIG. 3C is preferred to be as close to zero as possible for good magnetostatic coupling between layers 21 and 34 a, and between layers 21 and 34 b.

As illustrated in FIG. 3B, distance 36 may be negative wherein a portion of flux absorbing stripe 34 a including edge 34 e 2 is aligned above free layer 21, and a portion of flux absorbing stripe 34 b including edge 34 e 1 is aligned above the free layer. In all embodiments, adjacent pairs of opposing first edges and second edges such as first pair 21 e 1, 34 e 1 and second pair 21 e 2, 34 e 2 are aligned parallel to each other, and adjacent edge pairs are separated from one another by a distance that is no greater than twice the larger of the free layer and flux absorbing stripe thicknesses, as measured from one of the opposing first edges in a direction parallel to said free layer top surface.

Embodiment 3

This embodiment, shown in FIGS. 4A-4C, is the same as embodiment 1 except that flux absorbing stripes 44 a, 44 b have asymmetrically tapered edges. The thickness of each flux absorbing stripe in a z-axis direction between bottom surface 44 d and top surface 44 t satisfies the requirement M_(film)t_(film)>M_(free)t_(free). In FIG. 4A, there is a plane 40-40 that bisects the MR stripe including free layer 21 in a lengthwise direction along the y-axis. A second edge 44 e 2 of a first flux absorbing stripe 44 a is offset from a first edge 21 e 2 of the free layer along the x-axis direction that is orthogonal to plane 40-40. A second edge 44 e 1 of a second flux absorbing stripe 44 b is offset from a first opposing edge 21 e 1 of the free layer along a (−)x-axis direction. Furthermore, each edge 44 s forms a sloped surface that connects an edge 21 e 1 or 21 e 2 to a top surface 44 t. Note that as the distance along sloped surface 44 s from edge 21 e or 21 e 2 becomes increasingly greater, the distance between slope 44 s and bottom surface 44 d also becomes larger. Tapering such as sloped surfaces 44 s serve to concentrate flux into free layer 21 thereby increasing sensitivity of magnetization therein to external fields.

As illustrated in FIG. 4B, distance 36 may be negative since a portion of flux absorbing stripe 44 a including edge 44 e 2 may be aligned above free layer 21, and a portion of flux absorbing stripe 44 b including edge 44 e 1 may be aligned above a top surface 21 t of the free layer. FIG. 4C corresponds to a top-down view of the structure in FIG. 4A.

Embodiment 4

Another embodiment shown in FIGS. 5A-5C is the same as embodiment 1 except distance 57 that represents the separation between a top surface 21 t of free layer 21 and a top surface 24 t of flux absorbing stripes 24 a, 24 b is equal to or larger than the thickness of the free layer. Thus, the flux absorbing stripes are entirely formed below a plane 42-42 that includes the bottom surface of the MR stripe. The thickness of the flux absorbing stripes and free layer still satisfies M_(film)t_(film)>M_(free)t_(free). Distance 36 along the x-axis direction is preferably as close to zero as possible for good magnetostatic coupling between the free layer and flux absorbing stripes. In FIG. 5A, no portion of the MR sensor or free layer is aligned above a flux absorbing stripe which means no overlap of layer 21 with layers 24 a, 24 b in a z-axis direction. As discussed above and depicted in the cross-sectional view in FIG. 5B, distance 36 may be negative such that portions of the free layer 21 and MR stripe are aligned above layers 24 a, 24 b. In other words, free layer edges 21 e 1 and 21 e 2 may be formed above a top surface 24 t of the flux absorbing stripes.

Embodiment 5

Another embodiment shown in FIGS. 6A-6C is the same as in embodiment 4 except that flux absorbing stripes 64 a, 64 b have asymmetrically tapered edges. Moreover, a top surface 64 t of the flux absorbing stripes may be below a top surface 21 t of the free layer and above a bottom surface 22 b of the reference layer. The thickness of each flux absorbing stripe in a z-axis direction between bottom surface 64 d and top surface 64 t satisfies the requirement M_(film)t_(film)>M_(free)t_(free). In FIG. 6A, there is a plane 40-40 that bisects the MR stripe including free layer 21 in a lengthwise direction along the y-axis. A second edge 64 e 2 of a first flux absorbing stripe 64 a is offset from a first edge 21 e 2 of the free layer along the x-axis direction that is orthogonal to plane 40-40. A second edge 64 e 1 of a second flux absorbing stripe 64 b is offset from a first opposing edge 21 e 1 of the free layer along a (−)x-axis direction. Furthermore, each edge 64 s forms a sloped surface that connects an edge 21 e 1 or 21 e 2 to a bottom surface 64 d. Note that as the distance along sloped surface 64 s from edge 21 e or 21 e 2 becomes increasingly greater, the distance between slope 64 s and top surface 64 t also becomes larger. Tapering that is represented by sloped surfaces 64 s serves to concentrate flux into free layer 21, thereby increasing sensitivity of magnetization therein to external fields.

In an alternative embodiment illustrated by the cross-sectional view in FIG. 6B, the flux absorbing stripes may be formed entirely below a bottom surface of the MR stripe. Thus, edges 64 e 1, 64 e 2 are aligned below a bottom surface of reference layer 23. Distance 36 corresponding to the gap between stripe 64 a (or 64 b) and the MR stripe in FIG. 6A has a positive value. However, the separation between a flux absorbing stripe and MR stripe is considered to be negative in a configuration (FIG. 6B) where a portion of flux absorbing stripe 64 a including edge 64 e 2 is aligned below free layer 21, and a portion of flux absorbing stripe 64 b including edge 64 e 1 is aligned below a top surface 21 t of the free layer.

Embodiment 6

This embodiment shown in FIGS. 7A-7B is the same as embodiment 1 except that each flux absorbing stripe 74 a, 74 b has two symmetrically tapered edges 74 r, 74 s. The tapered edges 74 r, 74 s connect edge 74 e 2 to top surface 74 t and bottom surface 74 d, respectively, in flux absorbing stripe 74 a and extend essentially an equal distance from edge 74 e 2. Likewise, the two tapered edges connect edge 74 e 1 to top surface 74 t and bottom surface 74 d in flux absorbing stripe 74 b. According to this embodiment, edges 74 e 1, 74 e 2 preferably face free layer edges 21 e 1, 21 e 2, respectively. Therefore, the flux absorbing stripes are aligned opposite the free layer along an x-axis direction and are thinnest at edges 74 e 1, 74 e 2 and grow thicker (uniformly in both vertical directions) with increasing distance from the free layer until reaching a constant thickness value. As mentioned previously, tapered flux absorbing stripes serve to concentrate flux into the free layer thereby increasing sensor sensitivity to an external field. The thickness of flux absorbing stripes 74 a, 74 b satisfies the relationship M_(film)t_(film)>M_(free)t_(free). Spacing 36 between layers 21 and 74 a, 74 b is no greater than twice the larger of the free layer thickness and thickness of the flux absorbing stripes at locations closest to the free layer. 

What is claimed is:
 1. A magnetic sensor, comprising: a magnetoresistive (MR) device comprising a plurality of layers and patterned in the form of a MR stripe having a first bottom surface, a top layer that is a magnetically free layer having a first top surface, a first thickness, an aspect ratio of at least 5, and a pair of opposing first edges that are equidistant from a center plane that bisects the MR stripe in a lengthwise direction that is perpendicular to a width of the free layer along a second direction, each of the opposing first edges is formed along a side of each of the plurality of layers including the free layer; and a pair of flux absorbing stripes each with a second bottom surface formed at or above a first plane that includes the first top surface or each with a second top surface formed at or below a second plane that includes the first bottom surface, and having a second edge facing the center plane, and a second thickness between the second top surface and the second bottom surface, a product of flux absorbing stripe magnetization times the second thickness is greater than a product of free layer magnetization times the first thickness, and wherein the second edge of a first flux absorbing stripe is offset from one of the opposing first edges of the free layer and MR sensor along the second direction, and the second edge of a second flux absorbing stripe is offset from another of the opposing first edges of the free layer and MR sensor along the second direction, and wherein adjacent pairs of opposing first edges and second edges are aligned parallel to each other.
 2. The magnetic sensor of claim 1 wherein the first thickness is from about 10 to 300 Angstroms and the second thickness is from about 10 to 1000 Angstroms.
 3. The magnetic sensor of claim 1 wherein each flux absorbing stripe is formed from one or more layers, and contains one or more elements selected from Co, Fe, Ni, B, N, Cr, Hf, Nb, and Zr.
 4. The magnetic sensor of claim 1 wherein the flux absorbing stripes and the free layer have a magnetization M_(film) and M_(free), respectively, and a thickness t_(film) and t_(free), respectively, such that M_(film)t_(film)<M_(free)t_(free).
 5. The magnetic sensor of claim 1 wherein the flux absorbing stripes are not aligned above or below any portion of the free layer and there is a separation of less than 0.1 microns between the second edge in each flux absorbing stripe and the opposing first edge in the MR stripe along the second direction.
 6. The magnetic sensor of claim 5 wherein each flux absorbing stripe is formed at or above the first plane and is further comprised of a tapered third edge that extends from the second edge to the second top surface such that each flux absorbing stripe is thinnest at the second edge and becomes thicker with increasing distance from the second edge until reaching the second thickness.
 7. The magnetic sensor of claim 1 wherein a portion of the first top surface is aligned below the pair of flux absorbing stripes such that the second edges overlap the first top surface.
 8. The magnetic sensor of claim 7 wherein each flux absorbing stripe is further comprised of a tapered third edge that extends from the second edge to the second top surface such that each flux absorbing stripe is thinnest at the second edge and becomes thicker with increasing distance from the second edge until reaching the second thickness.
 9. The magnetic sensor of claim 1 wherein a portion of each of the second top surfaces is aligned below the free layer and MR sensor such that the opposing first edges overlap a portion of each flux absorbing stripe.
 10. The magnetic sensor of claim 9 wherein each flux absorbing stripe is further comprised of a tapered third edge that extends from the second edge to the second bottom surface such that each flux absorbing stripe is thinnest at the second edge and becomes thicker with increasing distance from the second edge until reaching the second thickness. 